Drawing for CANADA CONES

USPTO serial 74319971

CANADA CONES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUEHLING, EVERETT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANADA CONES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ward Brown

WARD BROWN CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, JOHNSON, ET AL2800 PACIFIC FIRST CTR1420 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101-2347

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030frozen confections hand made in the United States in view of purchasers and prospective purchasersABANDONED—
042retail services performed in the United States in the field of frozen confections hand made in the United States in view of purchasers and prospective purchasersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 30, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 22, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 29, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 27, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 21, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 23, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 29, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance