Drawing for LOUIS RICH CLUB

USPTO serial 74319989

LOUIS RICH CLUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOUIS RICH CLUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald B. Aiken

DONALD B AIKEN KRAFT GENERAL FOODS, INCKRAFT COURTGLENVIEW, IL 60025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041promoting the sale of food products through the distribution of printed materials, promotional services and coupon redemption programs directed to consumersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 11, 1995EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 11, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 16, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 24, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 1994AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 28, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 1, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance