Drawing for MAX MOON

USPTO serial 74320117

MAX MOON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAX MOON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaux E. Levy

MARGAUX E LEVY TITAN SPORTS, INC1241 E MAIN STSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028action figures, board games, toy miniature dolls, toy wrestling gear sets consisting of a toy wrestling ring and toy wrestling belts, electronic games related to the sport of wrestling, card games, video game programs related to the sport of wrestling, hand held electronic games related to the sport of wrestling, arcade games related to the sport of wrestling, jigsaw puzzles, kites, toy flying discs, baseball gloves and toy spinning topsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 1994ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 9, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance