USPTO serial 74320258
K
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with K?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Verwoerdburg 0157, Transvaal, ZA
Verwoerdburg 0157, Transvaal, ZA
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
Chandler, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW P BRIDGES
ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NANOTEQ (PTY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by NANOTEQ (PTY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named K
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |