USPTO serial 74320564
EARLY TREATMENT ORTHODONTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2042451Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 1997
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EARLY TREATMENT ORTHODONTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. Marsh
THOMAS R MARSH SHERIDAN, ROSS & MCINTOSH1700 LINCOLN ST STE 3500DENVER, CO 80203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | products used for orthodontic therapy, namely, transverse and antero-posterior expansive lingual arches, labial arches, lingual tubes, arch wire, swallowing habit correction appliance and jaw positioning appliance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 17, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 7, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | AAUW | ALLEGED AMENDMENT TO USE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |