USPTO serial 74320702
FEED THE HUNGRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FEED THE HUNGRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Hall
JAMES D HALL BAKER & DANIELS205 W JEFFERSON BLVDSTE 250SOUTH BEND, IN 46601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | charitable services in the nature of emergency relief and aid; namely, providing food, medical assistance, dental equipment, hygienic supplies, clothing, educational materials, spiritual materials, housing and shelters, and household furnishings to people all over the world who are impoverished or deprived by reason of war, famine, natural disaster, economic crisis, disease, and tragedy or catastrophe of any type | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 30, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |