USPTO serial 74321026
HICKOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HICKOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David H. Tannenbaum
DAVID H TANNENBAUM WINSTEAD SECHREST & MINICK PC5400 RENAISSANCE TWR1201 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75270-2199Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, hats, scarves, suits, dress and casual shirts, tank tops, T-shirts, dress and casual slacks, vests, walking shorts, play shorts, dress shorts, undergarments, pajamas, robes, loungewear, dresses, blouses, skirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, sweatpants, jackets, blazers, sport coats, coats, lingerie, hosiery, socks, leotards, tights, swimwear and footwear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 25, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 14, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |