USPTO serial 74321027
HICKOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HICKOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip T. Golden
PHILIP T GOLDEN WINSTEAD SECHREST & MINICK910 TRAVISSTE 1700HOUSTON, TX 77002-5895Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | sporting goods; namely, basketballs, baseballs, golf clubs, golf balls, fishing rods and reels, fishing tackle, exercise machines, soccer balls, tennis balls, tennis racquets, racquetball racquets and bicycles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 3, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 3, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 26, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 4, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |