USPTO serial 74321042
DRAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
F. Drake & Company of Golcar Ltd.
West Yorkshire HD7 5BB, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Thad Adams, III
W THAD ADAMS III2180 FIRST UNION PLZCHARLOTTE, NC 28282UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | natural and synthetic fibres, twines and cords; polypropylene fibre and polypropylene fibrous material; carpet fibre; high bulk fibres; ropes; hold down straps, general utility bags for commercial use, commercial nets, slings of rope or fabric; slivers, neps and burrs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |