Drawing for RELIABILITY BASED MANUFACTURING

USPTO serial 74321872

RELIABILITY BASED MANUFACTURING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CONN, WILLIAM A.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RELIABILITY BASED MANUFACTURING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Neely

ANDREW S NEELY LUEDEKA, HODGES, NEELY & GRAHAM, PC1030 FIRST AMERICAN CTR507 GAY STKNOXVILLE, TN 37902

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009instruments, equipment and software for use in determining the maintenance status of machinery and equipment; namely, microprocessor based monitors, data collectors and analyzers for collecting, storing and analyzing data relating to the maintenance status of machines; shaft alignment detectors and analyzers for monitoring the alignment status of mated shafts; monitors and analyzers for detecting and analyzing the balance of rotating machinery and equipment parts; instruments for analyzing and quantifying the lubricating characteristics of use lubricants; accelerometers, velocity and displacement probes, and thermal sensors; and computer programs for use in storing, analyzing and reporting maintenance data and generating maintenance status reports for machinery and equipmentABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 1995ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 23, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 22, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance