Drawing for MOONSTAR

USPTO serial 74322189

MOONSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOONSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherri L. Rohlf

SHERRI L ROHLF SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER & DUFFY, PA1300 WASHINGTON SQ100 WASHINGTON AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003hair care products; namely, shampoos, conditioners, spray and sculpting gel, skin care products; namely, moisturizers, toners, cleansers, lotions and masks; color cosmetics; namely, lipstick, eyeshadows, foundation cream, blushes, face powder; personal hygiene products; namely, total body cleansers, toilet water, perfumes, colognes, massage oils, skin oils and hydrating body emulsions; and home hygiene products; namely, dish cleansers, all purpose cleansers, fabric cleansers, window and toilet cleansersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 1994ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 1994EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 28, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 2, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance