USPTO serial 74322284
PALM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PALM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megan G. Smith
MEGAN G SMITH COOLEY GODWARD CASTRO HUDDLESON & TATUMONE MARITIME PLZ 20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software programs for personal and handheld computers and related instruction manuals sold together as a unit for business and personal use to increase productivity and acces information; electronic devices for personal and handheld computers; namely, protocol converters, signal cables, modems, memory cards, and power cables; accessories for personal and handheld computers; namely, carrying cases, pens, racks and holders for attaching handheld computers to the other objects, racks and holders for holding handheld computers and other objects, and racks and holders for holding handheld computers and other objects, and racks and holders for attaching objects to handheld computers and electronic organizers; namely, computer hardware and software for use in organizing personal business | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 1995 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 12, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 25, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |