USPTO serial 74322415
SHAMPOOCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1988754Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 23, 1996
- Examiner
- SMITH, LAURA E
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHAMPOOCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chatsworth, CA
RACHO MIRAGE, CA
Chatsworth, CA
Chatsworth, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN PLOTKIN
STEVEN PLOTKIN JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4308UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cosmania, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by STROM SALES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Cosmania, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cosmania, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named SHAMPOOCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 14, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |