Drawing for Serial No. 74322450

USPTO serial 74322450

Serial No. 74322450

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74322450?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET STSIXTEENTH FLSAN JOSE, CA 05113

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs for business, scientific, technical, commercial, education and personal computer uses in the field of databases; namely, database management software for creating, organizing and searching databases and database files and for generating reports therefrom, and for developing specific database applications, and instructional muanuals distributed therewithABANDONEDSep 23, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 10, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 25, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 12, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 18, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance