USPTO serial 74322511
FAST 'N FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FAST 'N FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen C. Clifford
STEPHEN C CLIFFORD KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN, PCSTE 1500FOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper articles; namely, cups, bags, food wrappers, and napkins | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | straws | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | food products; namely, sandwiches, burritos, nacho cheese, popcorn, muffins, pastries; condiments; namely, ketchup, mustard, relish, mayonnaise, hot sauce, horseradish, lemon, onion, pepper, salt, taco sauce | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | creamer packages, sugar packages | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | beverages; namely, coffee, tea, hot chocolate, soft drinks and frozen beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | rental of dispensing machines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Russellville Tobacco Company
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FAST 'N FRESH
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |