USPTO serial 74322525
VOSSIUS & PARTNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VOSSIUS & PARTNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
8000 Munich 80, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas E. Spath
THOMAS E SPATH DAVIS HOXIE FAITHFULL & HAPGOOD45 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | legal services rendered in the federal republic of Germany, before the European patent office and the world intellectual property organization | ABANDONED | Jun 29, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 1996 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 22, 1993 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 25, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 30, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |