USPTO serial 74323564
51.50 ILLEGALLY INSANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 51.50 ILLEGALLY INSANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Rafael, CA
San Rafael, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of a musical group | ABANDONED | Aug 19, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 27, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |