USPTO serial 74323656
SAHZA BY GFT DONNA AUTENTICO FEMMINILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAHZA BY GFT DONNA AUTENTICO FEMMINILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
10148 Torino, IT
10148 Torino, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear
JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | skirts, trousers, dresses, suits, jackets, coats, shirts, bodysuits, body stocking, swimsuits, T-shirts, sweaters, cloaks, scarves, foulards; shoes, boots and slippers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| May 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 1993 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 27, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |