USPTO serial 74323699
CAFFE' GRECO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2000
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CAFFE' GRECO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURENCE B BOND
LAURENCE B BOND TRASK BRITT & ROSSAP O BOX 2550SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | services relating to hotels, coffee shops, coffee shop-style restaurants, bars and holiday camps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Antico Caffe' Greco S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by Antico Caffe' Greco S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by Antico Caffe' Greco S.r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CAFFE' GRECO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 14, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 1998 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |