Drawing for INTEGRATOR

USPTO serial 74323757

INTEGRATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, CARYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEGRATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kerry L. Timbers

KERRY L TIMBERS BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN125 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009programmable electronic controls for heating, ventilating, air conditioning, access, and lighting for commercial and institutional buildings, and software and parts thereforABANDONEDOct 31, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 17, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 3, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 3, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 13, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance