Drawing for CHICKEN FLAMEANTE

USPTO serial 74323779

CHICKEN FLAMEANTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOORHEAD CORA ANN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHICKEN FLAMEANTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles W. Hanor

CHARLES W HANOR AKIN, GUMP, HAUER & FELD, LLP1500 NATIONS BANK PLZ300 CONVENTSAN ANTONIO, TX 78205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant servicesABANDONEDJun 25, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 10, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 23, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 8, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 7, 1995UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 31, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 22, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 1, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance