USPTO serial 74323972
NOTTINGHAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOTTINGHAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGG CANNADY
GREGG CANNADY CARRINGTON, COLEMAN, SLOMAN & BLUMENTHALSTE 1500200 CRESCENT COURTDALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | decorative pillows | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |