USPTO serial 74324186
OLD COURSE ST. ANDREWS SCOTLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OLD COURSE ST. ANDREWS SCOTLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Godalming Surrey GU7 2RG, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger L. Browdy
ROGER L BROWDY BROWDY AND NEIMARK, PLLC624 NINTH ST N WSTE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001-5303Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | wallets for golf score cards, shoe bags for travel, made of leather or imitation leather; umbrellas | ACTIVE | Aug 28, 1985 |
| 028 | golf balls, golf ball containers and pouches, tees, markers, pitch mark repairers, golf bags, name tags for golf bags, golf clubs, golf club head covers, golf putter covers, golf score card holders | ACTIVE | Aug 28, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |