USPTO serial 74324490
HEALTH INSURANCE TREND MODEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALTH INSURANCE TREND MODEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Lipton
ROBERT S LIPTON LIPTON & STAPLER201 N JACKSON STP O BOX 934MEDIA, PA 19063Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | periodical publications, consisting of reports, graphs, charts and data pertaining to health insurance trends | ABANDONED | Aug 31, 1987 |
| 035 | consulting services in the field of health insurance trends and health care cost containment and review | ABANDONED | Jul 5, 1987 |
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting training classes in the field of health cre costs containment and review | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 4, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 1995 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |