USPTO serial 74324575
PINPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PINPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen G. Rudisill
STEPHEN G RUDISILL ARNOLD, WHITE & DURKEEP O BOX 4433HOUSTON, TX 77210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | data communication and radio-location equipment; namely, ranging and data transponders for receiving and sending data signals between the mobile units and fixed base stations | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | remote radio-location of mobile units and two-way radio-frequency packet-message delivery services, ideally suited to vehicular and mobile applications | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pinpoint Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pinpoint Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named PINPOINT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |