USPTO serial 74325544
OPTIMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTIMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Garland C. Boothe, Jr.
GARLAND C BOOTHE JR AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANYONE CYANAMID PLZWAYNE, NJ 07470-8426UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | handheld devices for laparoscopic surgery | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |