USPTO serial 74325577
TORCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TORCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Marietta, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George M. Thomas
GEORGE M THOMAS HOPKINS & THOMAS100 GALLERIA PKWY NW STE 1550ATLANTA, GA 30339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | custom manufacturing components of precision machined metal parts and assemblies, comprising; parts for internal combustion engines, cam follower shafts, rocker arm adjusting screws; fuel injector parts; and carburetor parts; parts for headlight doors for automobiles; spark plug bodies; parts for electric power tools, comprising shafts and machined components; vacuum cleaner parts; and parts and assembled tools for cutting plastic pipes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |