USPTO serial 74325613
SHARKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVY, MICHAEL S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHARKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buffalo Grove, IL
Buffalo Grove, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. Phillips
RICHARD S PHILLIPS WOOD, PHILLIPS, VANSANTEN, ET AL500 W MADISON ST STE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60661-2511UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | caps | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 17, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 22, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |