Drawing for TWIN PEAKS

USPTO serial 74328691

TWIN PEAKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWIN PEAKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil E. Taxy

Neil E. Taxy Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick, L199 Fremont Street21st FloorSan Francisco, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029evaporated milk, sweetened condensed milk and sweetened condensed filled dairy product (excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt)ABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 1993ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 14, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance