USPTO serial 74328989
ECOSOLV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOSOLV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Liss
MARK J LISS LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYERTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | photographic chemicals, photocopier chemicals; sensitized photographic film, photosensitive paper; emulsifiers for use in the manufacture of printing plates and platemaking, pressroom and other printing chemicals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1995 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 20, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |