Drawing for HEALTHY EATING

USPTO serial 74330564

HEALTHY EATING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHY EATING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay K. Meadway

JAY K MEADWAY1601 MARKET ST 36TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042healthcare services; namely, individualized consultation in the field of diet and nutritionABANDONEDSep 1, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 19, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 19, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 20, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 2, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 10, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 11, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 27, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 7, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance