Drawing for FLY TECH

USPTO serial 74330917

FLY TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1894491Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 16, 1995
Examiner
—
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLY TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIE C. VANDERZANDEN

PURE FISHING INC7 SCIENCE COURTCOLUMBIA, SC 29223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018[ back packs and fanny packs ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 15, 1993
025sportswear; namely, [shirts,] [ shorts, ] [pants,] fishing waders and footwear, [ fishing vests ] [and rainwear]SECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 15, 1993
028[fishing and other sports equipment and accessories, namely tubes in the nature of fishing floats [ and roll bags ] and gear bags; namely, sportsman's fishing bags]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 15, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2014ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 5, 2014C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 5, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 29, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Apr 17, 2014PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 31, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 1, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2005RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 3, 20059G8PREGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8—
Jun 3, 20058PRTREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED—
Jun 3, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Apr 19, 200589AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Apr 19, 2005E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2001C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 23, 2001815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 16, 1995R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 13, 1994CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 3, 1994SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 10, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 13, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 1994EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 12, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance