USPTO serial 74330973
GRUNT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VLCEK, TOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRUNT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mittagong, New South Wales, 2575, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E. Marames
WILLIAM E MARAMES KANE, DALSIMER, SULLIVAN, KURUCZ, ET AL711 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietary supplements, nutritional and dietary drink mixes for use as a meal replacement, meal replacement drinks, nutritional drinks and meal replacement powders | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | grain-based food beverages, herbal food beverages, and chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable-based | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | sports drinks, fruit juices, mineral water, soft drinks, and preparations for making sports drinks, fruit drinks and soft drinks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |