USPTO serial 74331578
SMARTWALLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CATALDO, PETER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMARTWALLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore D. Lienesch
THEODORE D LIENESCH THOMPSON, HINE AND FLORY2000 COURTHOUSE PLZ NEPOST OFFICE BOX 8801DAYTON, OH 45401-8801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | integrated circuit cards; integrated circuit card-based system comprised of computer hardware, software for use in security and financial applications; and electronic products; namely, a multi-function card having an embedded integrated circuit and a magnetic strip which carries physical and financial information specific to the user of the card to effect financial transactions and enable access to secure areas, and instruction manuals sold as a unit therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |