USPTO serial 74331677
MAXTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
N-0164 Oslo, NO
N-0164 Oslo, NO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark F. Radcliffe
MARK F RADCLIFFE WARE & FREIDENRICH, PC400 HAMILTON AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1825UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telephones and parts thereof; computers and parts thereof, computer peripherals; namely, computer printers, computer keyboards, computer voice-recognition devices, computer pens for writing on a monitor screen, converters between digital and analog communication and parts thereof; computer software for operating telecommunications equipment and for on-screen user interface; and computer software for electronic information exchange, electronic ordering, electronic billing, electronic delivery and electronic payment of goods and services, electronic entertainment and electronic publishing | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |