USPTO serial 74332074
ESPRIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESPRIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ALCOHOL COUNTERMEASURE SYSTEMS CORP.
Mississauga, Ontario, L5T 2C6, CA
Other trademarks owned by ALCOHOL COUNTERMEASURE SYSTEMS CORP.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Yates Dowell, III
A YATES DOWELL III DOWELL & DOWELLSTE 7052001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | alcohol breath testers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |