USPTO serial 74332210
MAMIYA-OP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUN, JEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAMIYA-OP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Iruma-shi, Saitama-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Jackson
DAVID A JACKSON KLAUBER & JACKSONCONTINENTAL PLZ411 HACKENSACK AVEHACKENSACK, NJ 07601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | lenses for astrophotography; binoculars; cameras for photography; cases especially made for photographic apparatus and instruments; photographic, electrostatic, thermal copying machines; drainers for use in photography film processing; drying apparatus for photographic prints; enlargers for use in photographic film processing; light meters; filters for cameras and camera lenses; flash-bulbs for photography; frames for photographic prints; optical lenses; magnifying glasses [optics]; centering apparatus for processing photographic transparencies; prisms for scientific purposes; shutters and shutter releases for cameras; slides for photography; glasses; sspectacles; [optics]; spools for cameras; camera stands; tripods for cameras; viewfinders for photography | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 27, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |