Drawing for PERSONAL TELEVISION

USPTO serial 74333302

PERSONAL TELEVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERSONAL TELEVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurence R. Brown

LAURENCE R BROWN2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 408ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035advertising services; namely, creating, preparing, processing, communicating and broadcasting video, digital and audio advertising materials for products and services of others with or without interactivity content for participation by recipients, said communication and broadcasting services; namely, for electronic transmission of video, audio and digital data by radio, cable, satellite, television and digital transmission linksABANDONED—
042leasing of computer facilities; namely, special purpose computer facilities employed in control of interactivity of subscribers in a television networkABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 25, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 11, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 6, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance