USPTO serial 74333495
BASYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BASYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Buonaiuto
MARK J BUONAIUTO BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INCLAW DEPT DF2-2E, PATENTS AND TRADEMARKSONE BAXTER PKWYDEERFIELD, IL 60015Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemistry analyzer | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | associated equipment for use with chemistry analyzer; namely, printers and supplies therefor, probes and accessories for use therewith, electrodes, sample handling, managing, and delivery system, tubing, syringes and syringe seals and valves, carriers, cleaning devices, containers and liners therefor bottles, labels, storage media, lamps, pumps, paddles, cuvettes, power cords, fuses, valves, filters, starter and installation kits, manuals and training materials; | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | chemical reagents for in-vitro diagnostic use; reagents comprised primarily of dry reagent tablets, deionized water for use therewith and liquid reagents, calibrators, and controls; chemical diluents used for reconstituting tableted reagents | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |