USPTO serial 74333559
CASK BREWING SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CASK BREWING SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. French
DAVID J FRENCH STN DP O BOX 2486OTTAWA, ON K1P 5W6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | brewing apparatus; namely, micro-brewery equipment and brewery equipment for installation in a brew pub or a brew-on-premises operation | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | books on brewing procedures | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | T-shirts and caps | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | advising on brewing procedures and endorsement of brewing operations using designated brewing apparatus | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |