Drawing for CASK BREWING SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 74333559

CASK BREWING SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASK BREWING SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. French

DAVID J FRENCH STN DP O BOX 2486OTTAWA, ON K1P 5W6CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011brewing apparatus; namely, micro-brewery equipment and brewery equipment for installation in a brew pub or a brew-on-premises operationABANDONED—
016books on brewing proceduresABANDONED—
025T-shirts and capsABANDONED—
041advising on brewing procedures and endorsement of brewing operations using designated brewing apparatusABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 1994PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 25, 1994PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Oct 18, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 4, 1993PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance