USPTO serial 74333819
LODYNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LODYNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, WC1B 3RA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerome Marger
JEROME MARGER MARGER JOHNSON MCCOLLOM & STOLOWITZ650 AMERICAN BANK BLDG621 S W MORRISON STPORTLAND, OR 97205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals, namely etchants for use in the fabrication, manufacture or processing of products or components in the electronics industry | ABANDONED | — |
| 003 | chemicals, namely cleaning compositions for use in the fabrication, manufacture or processing of products or components in the electronics industry | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |