USPTO serial 74334282
ILLUMINATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ILLUMINATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cobham, Surrey KT11 2EY, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allan L. Harms
ALLAN L HARMS WENZEL, PIERSALL & HARMS, PC4080 FIRST AVE NE STE 102P O BOX 999CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52406-0999Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | safety clothing; namely, vests, jackets, coats, belts, wrist bands, footwear and head wear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |