USPTO serial 74334334
CARLTON PLANTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 1997
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CARLTON PLANTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
DAYTON, OR, US
Gordon Bailey, a U.S. citizen, as trustee of the GORDON BAILEY REVOCABLE TRUST
Dayton, OR, US
NEWPORT, MN, US
Gordon Bailey, a U.S. citizen, as trustee of the GORDON BAILEY REVOCABLE TRUST
Dayton, OR, US
Gordon Bailey, a U.S. citizen, as trustee of the GORDON BAILEY REVOCABLE TRUST
Dayton, OR, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. McCormack
John M. McCormack KOLISCH HARTWELL,520 S.W. YAMHILL STREET, SUITE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | live trees and shrubs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Carlton Plants, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Gordon Bailey, a U.S. citizen, as trustee of the GORDON BAILEY REVOCABLE TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by BAILEY NURSERIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Gordon Bailey, a U.S. citizen, as trustee of the GORDON BAILEY REVOCABLE TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by Gordon Bailey, a U.S. citizen, as trustee of the GORDON BAILEY REVOCABLE TRUST
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named CARLTON PLANTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 2, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 2, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 17, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |