USPTO serial 74334524
AUROMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUROMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Menomonee Falls, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur L. Liberman
ARTHUR L LIBERMAN INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC10TH FL - LEGAL DEPT521 W 57TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | cultures for the food industry | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1980 |
| 002 | food colorants and beverage colorants | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1980 |
| 003 | oral care product flavor ingredients and oral care product flavor modifiers | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1980 |
| 005 | chewing gum flavor ingredients and chewing gum flavor modifiers, oral care product flavor ingredients and oral care product flavor modifiers | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1980 |
| 029 | food flavor ingredients and food flavor modifiers | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1980 |
| 030 | chewing gum flavor ingredients and chewing gum flavor modifiers | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1980 |
| 032 | beverage flavor ingredients and beverage flavor modifiers | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Auro Tech, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named AUROMA
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |