USPTO serial 74335426
HELIOTAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HELIOTAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LUDWIGSHAFEN, DE
LUDWIGSHAFEN, DE
Ludwigshafen D-67059, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT C ROSS
HERBERT C ROSS OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY666 THIRD AVE STE 1900NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics; namely, foundation makeup and lip balm; and sunscreen preparations; namely, oils, creams, lotions and gels for the face and body, eye cream, and lip balm | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |