USPTO serial 74335461
ADRENALINE ACTIONWEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2282351Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 1999
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ADRENALINE ACTIONWEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
La Crescenta, CA
La Crescenta, CA
La Crescenta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
S. MARTIN KELETI
S MARTIN KELETI COHEN AND COHEN740 N LA BREA AVELOS ANGELES, CA 90038-3339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | sportswear, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, shorts, caps, and hats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1996 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |