USPTO serial 74335556
ARMADILLO TEXAS GRILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 6, 1997
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARMADILLO TEXAS GRILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Etobicoke, Ontario M9W 6H3, CA
Etobicoke, Ontario M9W 6H3, CA
Etobicoke, Ontario M9W 6H3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Previto
JOSEPH J PREVITO STOLL, MISKIN, PREVITO & HOFFMAN350 FIFTH AVE STE 6110NEW YORK, NY 10118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2004 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 6, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 14, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 24, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 6, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |