Drawing for SEYMOUR DUNCAN

USPTO serial 74335599

SEYMOUR DUNCAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICARDO, RANDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEYMOUR DUNCAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015musical products; namely, electric and acoustic guitar, bass, banjo, mandolin and drum pickups, strings for guitars and electronic effects; namely, acoustic environmental controllersABANDONEDJan 10, 1978

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 1994PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 11, 1994PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jun 17, 1994ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 21, 1994PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 3, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 1993UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance