Drawing for THE AMERICAN SPORTSMAN

USPTO serial 74335817

THE AMERICAN SPORTSMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BONNET, ODETTE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE AMERICAN SPORTSMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arnold H. Krumholz

ARNOLD H KRUMHOLZ LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1497UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018leather goods; namely, wallets, purses, clutches, key cases, briefcase and pocket-type portfolios, and belt bagsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 22, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 1995EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 5, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 29, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 28, 1994ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 3, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 22, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 20, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 27, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 14, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance