Drawing for DICKENS COLLECTABLES

USPTO serial 74336917

DICKENS COLLECTABLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DICKENS COLLECTABLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES NESSLER

CHARLES NESSLER BOX HCHESTER, CT 06412UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Decorative ceramic houses and figurinesACTIVEJul 7, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 24, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 24, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 10, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 8, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 12, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 3, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 1994UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 28, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 12, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance